<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Discourse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpr.com/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpr.com/blog</link>
	<description>Communications in business, civic, and personal matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:49:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>PR problems?</title>
		<link>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=65</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=65#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the age of &#8220;spin,&#8221; managers tend to look for easy fixes when faced with serious disasters. Oil spills or lead-painted toys may be part of a manufacturing problem, a financial problem, or even an administrative problem &#8211; they are not problems caused by a faulty public relations strategy. Some will say that someone such [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the age of &#8220;spin,&#8221; managers tend to look for easy fixes when faced with serious disasters. Oil spills or lead-painted toys may be part of a manufacturing problem, a financial problem, or even an administrative problem &#8211; they are not problems caused by a faulty public relations strategy. Some will say that someone such as Britney Spears, for example, had a PR problem; all that negative publicity caused by drinking, drugs, and reckless behavior should have been papered over with a positive PR campaign, thus restoring her personality to her former glory. But Britney Spears did not have a PR problem at all &#8211; she had problems with drinking, drugs, and reckless behavior. PR was able to rescue Tylenol from a devastating blow to its sales figures when some criminal tampered with its products on the shelves, but the company itself was not culpable. A PR counter-offensive could be mounted, and, as it turned out, a highly effective one. Which brings us to the core issue &#8211; can PR save bad management? The short answer is no. There may be some exceptions, but they are rare. What management often fails to recognize is that PR counsel should be taken into account at the early stages of corporate planning, instead of being used as a last resort. Successful companies do. The rest inevitably end up with PR &#8220;problems.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=65</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparisons to the Nazi evil</title>
		<link>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=62</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=62#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 03:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nazism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talk show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has become fashionable, of late, to draw parallels between an assortment of complaints and the evils of the Nazi regime. It may be argued that in some cases they trivialize the horrors of Nazism, but in reality they often show an embarrassing lack of knowledge. A talk show person recently compared a reporter on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has become fashionable, of late, to draw parallels between an assortment of complaints and the evils of the Nazi regime. It may be argued that in some cases they trivialize the horrors of Nazism, but in reality they often show an embarrassing lack of knowledge. A talk show person recently compared a reporter on ABC to Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s propaganda minister. Goebbels had a chokehold on all cultural activities, from the cinema to publishing, art, and architecture. Apparently, this same radio person often refers to various perceived misdemeanors as evidence of Nazism in America today. But he’s not the only one; Hitler’s name is brandied about by all manner of people to drive home all sorts of arguments. I don’t think it requires a degree in psychology to realize that the very people who invoke Nazism as a paragon of evil are probably influenced by its dark shadow – why else would the comparison come so readily to mind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=62</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;After abundance, what?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=59</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=59#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 01:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social mores]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric Larrabee asked the question in a 1960 article in Horizon magazine. One of the cartoons illustrating the article showed a Detroit vice president with sample auto fins on his desk. It was a time when a 4% national growth rate could pay for just about everything the government needed to do – wage the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Larrabee asked the question in a 1960 article in Horizon magazine. One of the cartoons illustrating the article showed a Detroit vice president with sample auto fins on his desk. It was a time when a 4% national growth rate could pay for just about everything the government needed to do – wage the cold war, build highways and bridges, journey into space. Social programs had a way to go, but an affluent middle class was more interested in new cars, refrigerators, golf carts, and assorted gadgets. With robots starting to do all the work, the future’s problem seemed to be what to do with the leisure time that was sure to follow. By way of illustration, Larrabee quotes Frederik Pohl’s <em>The Midas Touch, </em>where an imaginary society has all the work done by robots, but the middle class has to consume all the goods produced – being frugal or thin are the prerogatives of the rich.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Fifty years later the prediction doesn’t appear to have to come to pass, or hasn’t it? Wall Street is practically begging the consumer to go out and spend, since it would appear that upon consumer spending hinges the well being of the nation. Robots have not lived up to expectations, but the flood of products coming from China might as well be made by robots – they’re certainly not made by Americans. What no one predicted in 1960 was that the middle class would begin to disappear. It is a dangerous time because social change often leads to unpredictable consequences – revolutions, religious intolerance, wars. The answer for the new millennium likely hinges on redefining capitalism to be more inclusive: After abundance, enlightment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=59</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The corporate logo on your genes – your genes?</title>
		<link>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=57</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=57#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How’s this for de-privatizing your body – some biotech company could own your genes (yes, own) and you wouldn’t know it until a crisis emerges. I recently read Michael Crichton’s Next, where the main plot revolves about corporate ownership of genes and their right to “mine” them from your body. Good yarn, I thought, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How’s this for de-privatizing your body – some biotech company could own your genes (yes, own) and you wouldn’t know it until a crisis emerges. I recently read Michael Crichton’s <em>Next</em>, where the main plot revolves about corporate ownership of genes and their right to “mine” them from your body. Good yarn, I thought, but come on, this is taking a flight of fancy into sci-fi. Last Sunday I watched CBS’s <em>60 Minutes</em>, and one of the segments explored – you got it, corporate ownership of genes via patent protection. University medical school are prevented from studying those genes, testing labs are prohibited from searching for them in your body, and the owning entity will deal with any medical condition related to those same genes if they feel it’s profitable enough. While we fret about the possible creation of ‘death panels’ by a government run health system, the private sector is quietly inserting its imprimatur up our rectum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=57</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy of ethics</title>
		<link>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=49</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=49#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course companies are in business to make a profit, but within the framework of legal and ethical rules. And there was a time, not so long ago, when even our financial institutions adhered to some kind of ethical standards. Insurance companies used to rely on statistical data to work out premiums, while competition took [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course companies are in business to make a profit, but within the framework of legal and ethical rules. And there was a time, not so long ago, when even our financial institutions adhered to some kind of ethical standards. Insurance companies used to rely on statistical data to work out premiums, while competition took care of the rest. That is not to say that outrageous situations did not emerge, with sick people being denied treatment on some technicality. But lately the situation has changed for the worse. Large institutions no longer seek to make a reasonable profit; they are actively engaged in swindling the public using any method at hand – very often through advertising.</p>
<p>You have doubtless come across ads for free credit reports, a ruse to get your credit card number and start charging you a monthly fee. You’ve also been exposed to car insurance ads touting the savings you can realize by comparing rates from other companies. If you’re over 65, there’s the bewildering maze of insurance offerings to supplement Medicare (and make Medicare a practical reality). The high cost of developing medicines is more than offset by profits that defy imagination, and the value of said medicines may be questionable in many cases (some manufacturers cheerfully inform their prospective customer that death is a possible side-effect, but not to worry – it’s FDA approved). The unfortunate reality is that unethical companies are run by unethical people. It will not be easy to replace criminal greed with a sense of ethics – besides, no one seems to be trying. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=49</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One hundred million sesterces stimulus – the parallels will stun you</title>
		<link>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=47</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=47#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a quotation from Book VI of The Annals, AD 32-37, by Cornelius Tacitus – it requires no explanation: Hence followed a scarcity of money, a great shock being given to all credit, the current coin too, in consequence of the conviction of so many persons and the sale of their property, being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is a quotation from Book VI of The Annals, AD 32-37, by Cornelius Tacitus – it requires no explanation:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hence followed a scarcity of money, a great shock being given to all credit, the current coin too, in consequence of the conviction of so many persons and the sale of their property, being locked up in the imperial treasury or the public exchequer. To meet this, the Senate had directed that every creditor should have two-thirds of his capital secured on estates in Italy. Creditors however were suing for payment in full, and it was not respectable for persons when sued to break faith. So, at first, there were clamorous meetings and importunate entreaties; then noisy applications to the praetor’s court. And the very device intended as a remedy, the sale and purchase of estates, proved the contrary, as the usurers had hoarded up all their money for buying land. The facilities for selling were followed by a fall of prices, and the deeper a man was in debt, the more reluctantly did he part with his property, and many were utterly ruined. The destruction of private wealth precipitated the fall of rank and reputation, till at last the emperor (Tiberius) interposed his aid by distributing throughout the banks a hundred million sesterces, and allowing freedom to borrow without interest for three years, provided the borrower gave security to the State in land to double the amount. Credit was thus restored, and gradually private lenders were found.</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--></input>
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=47</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fair news, balanced and objective</title>
		<link>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=44</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=44#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anchors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balanced news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Cross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s the proposition: Get your news from PR people – you know what they’re selling. If you’ve been following the debate over health care you have surely come to realize that the news channels are anything but unbiased; any last doubts you might have had about the idea of balanced news reporting have finally been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s the proposition: Get your news from PR people – you know what <em>they</em>’re selling. If you’ve been following the debate over health care you have surely come to realize that the news channels are anything but unbiased; any last doubts you might have had about the idea of balanced news reporting have finally been put to rest. News people continue to look with disdain upon “flacks” as individuals who will spin a story to any length in order to get a mention for their clients’ services or products. What do you call the endless succession of good-looking men and women who grace our TV screens during prime time news and beyond? The whole thing really becomes unraveled when “anchors” inject their own commentary – do these people know anything besides where to get their haircuts?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So here’s my proposal: let companies and organizations set-up their own news broadcasts, and let the public decide for themselves. Take health care, for example. Let’s hear it from Blue Cross, AARP, the AMA, the Democrats, the Republicans… Who needs a TV anchor to moderate? How does an inept and biased individual help in the process? It’s not the bias so much, you would expect some opinion to creep in, it’s the spectacle of grown man and women with the depth of knowledge of a 10-year-old posturing like adults.</p>
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden" />
<p><!--Session data--></p>
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--></input>
<input id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" type="hidden" />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=44</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The return of the robber barons</title>
		<link>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=41</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=41#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robber barons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about this economy? Staunch conservatives are foaming at the mouth as the new administration embarks on a spending spree of limitless proportions. “You’re nationalizing the Bank!” “This is socialism!” “Cut the goddam taxes!” Well, this may be a case of protesting too munch. At an earlier epoch of our nation’s history robber barons took [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about this economy? Staunch conservatives are foaming at the mouth as the new administration embarks on a spending spree of limitless proportions. “You’re nationalizing the Bank!” “This is socialism!” “Cut the goddam taxes!”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Well, this may be a case of protesting too munch. At an earlier epoch of our nation’s history robber barons took to the stage, and eventually – through legislation and enforcement – a healthy middle class came into being. This time around the robber barons are less visible, but they are there nevertheless. They hide behind the notion that market forces will take care of everything, when we all know how those forces can be manipulated. As a lifelong marketer I have come to appreciate what it takes to market a product or a service, and I can assure that we are not talking about the same market forces that have driven our economy to the brink of destruction. What we have here is deliberate fraud, also of limitless proportions. Oh sure, one or two rascals have been caught perpetrating Ponzi schemes, as if that pointed to the real culprits. The real culprits are the large financial institutions that have relinquished business principles for the siren call of the credit card mentality. If individuals could live beyond their means, why not corporations? The difference is that individuals don’t usually attempt to defraud the credit card companies. Financial institutions, deliberately and with malice, packaged and sold worthless pieces of paper to unwary investors – under no oversight or enforcement of existing laws. <P>Advertising of prescription medicines – despite the best efforts of countless lobbyists – has had to reveal to the public that side effects may include death, while financial institutions are under no obligations to tell you anything they choose to keep secret. The cry of<span> </span>“This is socialism!” as it relates to the current Democratic agenda may be right, but make no mistake – slogans are only ever used to camouflage the truth. The same robber barons who brought about this catastrophe now claim to be the defenders of their own corrupt brand of capitalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=41</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Our customers are drying up – cut the marketing budget!”</title>
		<link>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=37</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=37#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been several business downturns during the course of my business life, but none as precipitous as the current recession. In each of those other times marketing budgets – certainly advertising, PR, and trade shows – were cut with dull cleavers. There is no reason to think that it will be any different this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been several business downturns during the course of my business life, but none as precipitous as the current recession. In each of those other times marketing budgets – certainly advertising, PR, and trade shows – were cut with dull cleavers. There is no reason to think that it will be any different this time around.<P><br />
As a committed marketer I have always wondered why the rules get tossed aside in bad times. Just as we get hungriest for customers we stop chasing them. Are marketing costs that extravagant or discretionary? Yes they are – just ask any CFO. Well, CFOs will tell you that about any expenditure, but what about CEOs? It would seem that somewhere it is written than when buyers stop spending we enter the siege state – cut marketing costs, reduce inventories, prune personnel (you can finally get rid of expensive older people without running the risk of being charged with discrimination), and generally circle the wagons. Wow! What a formula for success. Shouldn’t we be looking to steal what few customers remain from the competition? Isn’t this the time to work on your image, while everyone else goes ‘dark?’ What about the old precept that compels us to never say <i>problem</i> when we can say <i>opportunity</i>? Nothing but a worn-out platitude, except that during a recession it might be a truism.<P><br />
Nonetheless, here’s where we are. What’s your story of marketing woes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=37</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Engine Optimized (SEO) – trench warfare in cyberspace</title>
		<link>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=35</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=35#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpr.com/blog/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advice abounds on how to optimize your website so that search engines find you quicker than your competitors. It is an arcane art, but only because its practitioners would have you think that it is. Yes, there are steps that you can take to fare better in searches, although it would appear that some of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table><TR><TD><br />
<table><TR><TD width="332"><img src="http://www.webpr.com/seo.jpg" alt="SEO tower" ></TD></TR></Table>Advice abounds on how to optimize your website so that search engines find you quicker than your competitors. It is an arcane art, but only because its practitioners would have you think that it is. Yes, there are steps that you can take to fare better in searches, although it would appear that some of the more basic and simple remedies are the most efficient. Making sure that each page heading reflects the content of that page, and that the appropriate keywords are entered, are generally accepted as important factors. Naturally, the content of each page should be in step with both, and links into your website also play significant roles. Negative influences – things that might keep you from doing well in searches – include the ‘frames’ architecture of a website, and certain drawbacks associated with the use of Cascading Style Sheets (CSS). <P><br />
The operators of search engines are interested in providing a service that fairly reflects the relative value of their searches, while the rest of us are out to skew those findings in our direction, whether or not we deserve it. And so the conflict goes on. Do we need to agonize over our position in searches? To some extent, yes, but there are so many other aspects of business that need our attention that where we end up in the search stakes is not that vital. Building a solid reputation, engendering trust, being responsive…if you can deal successfully with those elements, search engines will find you fast enough.<br />
</TD></TR></Table></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpr.com/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=35</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
